
(Remember Race 5 will be worth double points)
Points are calculated using the following formula:
points = 25*N^(0.30103)[(N+1-p)/N]^(2.0107)
where N is the field size, p is the placing.
OK, so what does this formula mean? Here is Dan Connelly's explanation:
-------
The following is my best stab at an analytic approach, but of
course there are infinite possibilies, so this is just an
example.
One reasonable constraint is the points progress smoothly zero
last to first -- no big jump at last place. This involves
a dependence on (N+1-p)/N, where p is the place (1, 2, 3...) and
N is the total field size.
Another principle is that placings near the top are worth more
than placings near the bottom -- sprinting for 30th place is
less important than the sprint for second. Thus, one can
raise the (N+1-p)/N to some superunity power. There are
other approaches one could take, like modified exponential,
but power-law is simple. It seems to
me calling first 8 times better than the median is fair, so
I'd stick "3" ( 2^3 = 8) here.
This leaves the issue of how the points for the win should scale
with the field size. A simple approach is to use field size
to some positive subunity power. The test question here is "how
much must the field size increase to make the win worth 1% more?" It
seems to me 2% is a bit low, but 4% is too high, so I'd take
3%. This makes the power (1/3). This means winning in a field
of 5 is like finishing fractionally something like 20% down in
a field of 40, with a win in the larger field worth double.
This seems about right to me, but then it's all opinion.
All that remains is some constant factor to put the
points in a good range. 25 seems to work.
So the formula I'd use is :
points = 25*N^(1/3)[(N+1-p)/N]^3
where N is the field size, p is the placing
This seems complicated, and it is. Trying to calculate this
when riding will result in the loss of several places, or more likely,
riding into a tree or barrier :). But with a spreadsheet,
this shouldn't be a huge issue.
---------
David Crum modified the super- and sub-unity powers a bit to produce slightly different results, but Dan's formula is still intact.
Here is the entire table of points out to 100 places.
Use this table to figure out how many points are available for a given field size.
If you want to go even further, you can
read up on the whole points saga at Topica's NCNCA email archive site (look for "Surf City series notes").
Thanks go to Dan Connelly and David Crum for assistance with the formula.